TRUTH
it's the new hate speech
"During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
George Orwell
9/11Truth
IAmTheFaceofTruth.com
Saturday 18 May 2024
WHO's Fascist F**kery: "Homicidal Racketeering Scheme Masquerading As Disease Prevention"
“If the government can suspend your rights anytime it deems something is a crisis, you don’t have rights. You have permissions.”
- “Pismo” on “X”
While our country sleepwalks through the deadly aftermath of the evil Covid-19 operation, the World Health Organization (WHO) puts the final touches on a nice bit of fuckery called its Pandemic Treaty on International Health Regulations (IHR) or “One Health” initiative, a Globalist power grab disguised in the saintly white robes of public health medicine. The agreement, to be finalized at the end of this month, will cede what’s left of your liberty to this unelected bureaucracy for the sake of global “equity and inclusivity,” meaning more lockdowns, constant surveillance, forced “vaccinations,” restrictions on medications, and censorship of anyone who voices a contrary opinion of these actions.
Sound familiar? Yeah, it’s Covid-19 all over again, a second crack at controlling everything you do and every choice you might make by a cabal of governments and corporations, in other words, an international gang of fascists. The WHO is an agency of the United Nations, run out of Switzerland. You might recall this is the same place where the World Economic Forum (the WEF, a.k.a. “Davos”) has its headquarters. For years, the WEF has been issuing blueprints for a techno-fascist global regime under which, they state baldly, “you will own nothing and be happy.” (And eat bugs.)
These birds are not kidding around, though anyone can see the megalomania on display,the grandiose will-to-power that seeks to subjugate the plebes of the world — and radically decrease our numbers — so that a remaining tiny elite can enter into a post-modern, techno-transhuman utopia uncluttered with us “useless eaters.” The corporate money and organizational mojo out of Davos is behind what amounts to a homicidal racketeering scheme masquerading as disease prevention.
Of course, the pharmaceutical companies are front-and-center in the mix. They stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars distributing their mandated “vaccines” — which, you know by now, will not be properly tested, and, as currently being demonstrated by the Covid shots, are covertly designed to kill as many people as possible over a long period of time by switching off the natural defenses of your immune system, guaranteeing bewilderment and compliance by the hoodwinked masses. This might sound like a paranoid sci-fi movie, but, alas, the first phase has already happened starting in 2020. And since the pharma companies provide most of the advertising revenue for cable news media, you have been successfully mind-fucked into not seeing what is going on all around you: a whole lot of sickness and death.
Fortunately, it is the nature of megalomania that it always thinks too highly of its power and reaches too far. For one thing, this WHO “treaty” has to be signed by its member nations. Not all of them are eager to do that. One was Slovakia, whose prime minister, Robert Fico, was gunned down a few days after he announced his country would opt out. The coterie of the USA behind the senile and incompetent “Joe Biden,” is avid to sign us onto the treaty, largely because much of global Big Pharma operates out of our country, and rents so many members of Congress, especially most of the Democratic Party.
Under the US Constitution, the president can’t follow through on an international treaty without the Senate’s approval by two-thirds of its members. Senator Ron Johnson (R-WI) has been the most active figure in that body investigating the crimes of the Covid-19 op and organizing votes against the treaty, which he declares to be all 49 Republican senators. Thus, there can be no two-thirds majority ratification of the WHO treaty.
But note that the shadow government running “Joe Biden” has been doing all kinds of things in overt defiance of the Constitution and the rulings of the US Supreme Court on what is permissible under the Constitution, for instance, cancelling colossal sums of college loan debt. The “Joe Biden” regime is lawless.Anyone following the malicious prosecutions of candidate Donald Trump and the mass round-up of J-6 protestors can see how that works. So, you are advised to call and write your elected representatives in Congress to make sure that the executive branch (the White House and its agencies) gets the message: no deal on the WHO treaty.
There are other trends underway at this time that may assist us in escaping what amounts to a globalist coup d’état. One is that the economic and political crack-up of Western Civ is tending in the opposite direction of the extreme centralization of power that the WHO represents. Things are breaking down, especially things organized at the gigantic scale. Just look at the chaos overtaking corporatized doctor practices and conglomeratized hospitals in America. The corruption and degeneracy of national governments, with their colossal bureaucracies, has reached the stage that few among the people subject to them can fail to notice. That has sapped their legitimacy and prompted citizens to non-compliance with their increasingly insane diktats.
Under the Constitution, the duties not spelled out under federal authority are left to the states. Public health is one of these.Accordingly, the attorney-generals of twenty-two US states have declared their objection to the WHO treaty in a letter to “Joe Biden” and their intent to ignore its commands. What remains to be seen is whether the Globalists can use a new engineered pathogen out of their many bioweapons labs to stir up another pandemic scare to terrorize the world population into being pushed around. Don’t doubt that they will try it, especially in a year when many nations will be holding elections. And don’t get fooled again when they do.
This piece of mine was published by the Baltimore Sun on May 31, 1998 — 25 years ago. It’s about the Nakba or Catastrophe — the massacres and forced expulsions of Palestinians which enabled the creation of the modern state of Israel, though I didn’t use that term. It’s notable that Israel at 75 seems to be getting lots less attention than Israel at 50 did. My dad died in 2017.
Sowing seeds of anger — Palestinians: Peace is impossible in the Middle East, the author writes, until Israel acknowledges its history of heaping injustices on the Palestinian people.
Land records with my grandfather's name — "Yusef Habib el Husseini" — in English, crossed out as the owner, and the "Israeli Authority of Construction" written in Hebrew.
IT WAS the most loving fax I've ever received. I had just come back to the office from asking Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a few questions at a news conference during his visit to Washington in January. I was astonished to learn that my dad, in Jordan, saw it on CNN International. "You were fantastic," he wrote me.
I was thinking of dad — and the fact that he and 700,000 other Palestinians were forced from their homes in 1948 — as I asked the Israeli leader if it was time that Israel acknowledged this wrong. The most he conceded was that the Palestinian people have indeed suffered — because of their own bad leadership.
[Here’s video of the exchange. I’m almost embarrassed now at how polite I was to Netanyahu, and I’m not going to take the time to rebut his distortions which should be evident to most readers. But I should note that I also ask about the assassination of Alex Odeh; David Sheen has noted: “In what could be something of a Freudian slip, Netanyahu bizarrely said to Husseini, ‘I assure you that our policy is to cooperate fully with the murderers.’” Full event.]
When Netanyahu returned to the United States this month, the Israeli prime minister rejected the paltry pullback from 13 percent of the West Bank that the Clinton administration favors. Netanyahu's position denies the Palestinian leadership even the slightest face-saving deal. In fact, if Israel gets its way, the Palestinians will be subjugated to "Bantustans," living in dense population areas and having limited control of the areas surrounding them. Israel wants to continue to control the population flow from various cities as well as most of the land and the water resources in the West Bank. As Netanyahu stalls for time, he confiscates more Palestinian land, heaps more injustice on an injured people and sows the seeds of more Palestinian resentment.
The inability of the Clinton administration to make any sort of progress prompted the French and the Egyptians to call for an international peace conference. That could put the issue of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict where it was 50 years ago: in the hands of the United Nations.
When I talked to dad on his birthday — April 9 — it was a low-key conversation. Neither of us mentioned that it was 50 years to the day after the massacre of Dir Yassin, a village near Jerusalem, by pro-Israeli forces. My father witnessed another massacre in Eilaboun, a village in the Galilee. The last time I was in the Middle East, I visited the towns and villages where my father was in 1948, and he put some flesh on events that he had hinted at for years.
One evening, we walked around Terra Sancta College, where my father was a boarder at the end of the British mandate, in a largely Jewish part of Jerusalem. On a similar evening in 1947, he was puzzled when he heard jubilation and dancing in the streets. Another student said that the United Nations apparently made a decision that the Jews liked. The United Nations had voted to partition Palestine. They had good reason to celebrate. The Jewish state was allocated 56 percent of Palestine, even though Jews owned only 6 percent of the land and made up one-third of the population — and most of them were mandate-era immigrants.
We visited Tiberias, where my dad was born. We saw the lovely stone house he was raised in, now empty, overlooking the Sea of Galilee. I had visions of its becoming a museum for what happened in 1948 — before it is demolished to make room for another hotel. Despite my prodding, my dad, hardly a shy man, did not want to try entering the house.
My dad told me of his earliest memories of his father, who was vice mayor of Tiberias, gerrymandering election maps. But a Christian, no matter how adept at dividing districts, could not secure re-election without substantial Jewish and Muslim support. There certainly were prejudices, but the intermingling of the faiths contradicts the "ancient hatreds" mantra we hear so often. Two of my uncles were nursed by neighbors because my grandmother had trouble lactating. One had a Muslim wet nurse, another was breast-fed by a Jewish neighbor.
We went to a lawyer's office, and he showed us the land records with my grandfather's name, "Yousef Habib Husseini" in English, crossed out as the owner, and the "Israeli Authority of Construction" written in Hebrew. My father's claim to ownership, though completely documented, has been denied by Israeli authorities because they regard him as "absentee" and thus not a legitimate inheritor. Never mind that he was driven out at gunpoint. Meanwhile, the World Jewish Restitution Organization is recovering Jewish property confiscated by the Nazis.
Tiberias fell to Israeli forces 50 years ago. It was then that my dad and his younger brother went to the small village of Eilaboun, where they had relatives. Today, my extended family members there are educated, but they retain a simplicity I haven't experienced elsewhere. They are technically Israeli citizens, but since they are not Jewish, they're third-class citizens. They and other Christians and Muslims cannot buy or lease land that the Israelis confiscated from my family — controlled by quasi-governmental organizations such as the Jewish National Fund.
The "who is a Jew" debate matters only because Jews in Israel are granted rights that others, like my relatives, are denied because of their religion — Christianity. Yet we are constantly told that Israel is a democracy. They do not dare go to picnics on Independence Holiday for fear of attacks from Jewish extremists — this after my relatives have been Israelis for 50 years.
Dad showed me the square where the massacre at Eilaboun took place. On Oct. 30, 1948, most everyone from the village was in the church as the Arab irregulars were withdrawing. The bombing from the Israeli forces came closer and closer until, finally, a loud voice in the village yard adjacent to the church said in broken Arabic, "He who wants to live, let him come out." They rushed outside with hands held high. The Israeli soldiers occasionally shot those coming out of the church, killing some, wounding others. The priest, with a white flag in hand, watched in horror.
Fourteen civilians from the village were put on a truck and led the convoy going north — to Lebanon. They were told that they were at the front in case of land mines. The Israelis proceeded to force the rest of the people, young and old, to walk. When they wanted people to stop, the Israeli soldiers would fire, sometimes into the crowd. A 3-year-old girl was shot in the arm as her mother was carrying her. My dad, then 16, jumped on top of his 10-year-old brother, who was very frail because of rheumatic fever — figuring that only one body would be exposed. When his father later found out about this, it was the only time my dad saw Grandpa cry.
People walked all day with no food. When a truck with some bread came by and people rushed toward it, soldiers shot at them, killing a 50-year-old man, Samaan Shufani, who was standing next to my dad moments earlier. Later, the Israeli soldiers took all the money from the men, strip-searched them and threatened to kill 10 men if the women didn't hand over 100 Palestinian pounds. My Aunt Julia came through — as she would years later, having saved several of my grandfather's letters. The village later repaid her.
The 14 men on the truck included some distant (by my standards) relatives, and they were taken back to Eilaboun — and shot in the town square. The other villagers were thrown on the Lebanese border. These were all relatively fortunate. My father was lucky because an uncle who was an officer in the Jordanian army took him in so he could continue his studies in Terra Sancta College, which had moved to Amman. Other Eilabounites made their way back to their village. The Israelis turned a blind eye to this, apparently in part because the church had protested the massacre of the 14 villagers.
Hundreds of thousands of other Palestinians are to this day in refugee camps in southern Lebanon — periodically getting bombed by Israel. As we drove around Galilee, we stopped at the village of Lubya. Or rather, all that remains of it. It is one of 418 villages razed by the Israelis after they drove out the 2,000 inhabitants. All you can see are hints of rows of stones tracing the foundations of homes.
As Elie Wiesel and others condemn ethnic cleansing in Bosnia-Herzegovina, they refuse to acknowledge that Israel has done something similar. ABC's Ted Koppel has falsely claimed that the Palestinians left voluntarily in 1948. Michael Lerner of the liberal Jewish magazine Tikkun has disavowed Jewish culpability in driving Palestinians from their homes. Early in the movie "Schindler's List," a Jew is shown pleading with the Nazis, saying that their seizure of his property violates the Geneva Convention. But Israel violates the same laws as it continues to confiscate Palestinian land.
The year 1948 resonates for Palestinians not just because it was a catastrophic time but also because the removal of Palestinians from their land has never stopped.
Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, Arab-Israeli citizens lived under suffocating military mandates. Similarly, Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza have contended for decades with Israeli military occupation, government schemes (permits, checkpoints, closures) that, by design or accident, pressure them into leaving. Another mass exodus took place in the 1967 war, and Israel continued expelling political leaders and others into the 1990s. Continued closures and checkpoints by Israeli authorities economically strangle the Palestinians, pressuring them into leaving.
The Israelis use the threat of another mass expulsion to coerce the Palestinians into accepting the starkly unequal terms of the Oslo Accords. Better to be subservient but keep a stake in your home, goes the reasoning of some Palestinians.
What is needed is to get rid of the myths. What is needed is a Truth and Reconciliation Commission similar to the one in South Africa. Real peace can come only through facing the past.
Sam Husseini is the former media director for the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee.
The Israeli Ties that Bind Us: How to Know You're in an Abusive Relationship
Breaking up is hard to do, but when you find yourself in an abusive relationship, it's necessary to sever ties... even if it's with the State of Israel.
The above video is footage from an undercover Al Jazeera investigation that was blocked from release in the United States and then subsequently leaked online.
THE DUOPOLY OF US/ISRAELI CITIZENSHIP
Today, I want to highlight the ever-present conflicts of interest posed by dual citizenship, particularly when it comes to U.S. officials and our nation's contentious relationship with Israel. With the recently passed Antisemitism Awareness Act threatening to extinguish our First Amendment rights like a bucket of water on a campfire, it's high time we confront this thorny issue head-on. So, grab a seat and hold on tight because we're about to jump into the heart of this constitutional conflagration.
While U.S. law does not prohibit dual citizenship, it's important to recognize the complications it can create within our U.S. elected representatives.
Yes, a strong U.S.-Israel alliance is not inherently an issue, but the extraordinarily extensive ties between these two countries raise serious questions about dual citizens in our government. How can we be sure that Israeli-American officials are acting solely in the interests of the United States and not being influenced by their loyalty to another country?
We can’t.
HOLDING THE LINE
As a former city council member and mayor in my small, Northern California town, I was subjected to more explicit rules and norms around loyalty, conflicts of interest, and serving the whole community than are specified in the Constitution for U.S. legislators.
California election laws are stringent in ensuring that candidates for local office truly represent the interests of their constituents. For example, a person running for city council must be a resident of the specific electoral district they seek to represent. They cannot be from a neighboring city or district, as this would be seen as a clear conflict of interest. The reasoning behind this is simple:
Elected officials should be fully invested in the well-being of the community they serve without divided loyalties or competing priorities.
This principle of undivided loyalty should logically extend to higher offices as well, including those at the national level. If we recognize the inherent conflict of interest in allowing someone to run for city council in a district they don't reside in, how can we turn a blind eye to the divided loyalties of dual citizens serving in Congress or other key government positions? Just as a city council member from a neighboring town might prioritize the interests of their home community over those they were elected to serve, a dual citizen in the federal government may be influenced by their allegiance to a foreign country, potentially compromising their ability to act solely in the best interests of the United States.
So, if little ol’ me had to abide by such principles on my tiny city council, why not our US legislators? How is THIS even legal?”
Rep. Brian Mast (R-Fla.) arrived Friday on Capitol Hill wearing his military uniform from his service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF)
A CONFLICTED RELATIONSHIP: US & ISRAEL
The U.S.-Israel relationship is a prime example of where these conflicts can arise. The United States provides a staggering amount of aid to Israel each year - over $3.8 billion in 2019 alone, mostly for military assistance. Since World War II, Israel has received over $318 billion in total U.S. aid, far more than any other country.
Do you think this would happen without the help of US/Israel dual citizenship?
On top of that, the U.S. and Israel have an extremely close military and intelligence partnership, with Israeli technology helping to “protect U.S. infrastructure and troops” while, in actuality, providing a surveillance system on the U.S. government, Americans, and their actions.
7 out of 100 Senators who have NOT taken any money from AIPAC. This should tell us everything we need to know….
The close ties between U.S. law enforcement and Israel extend beyond the realm of ideology and into direct training and cooperation.
For over two decades, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) has been training U.S. police departments, sharing tactics and strategies that have been honed in the context of Israel's military occupation of Palestinian territories. This training often includes techniques for crowd control, surveillance, and the use of force, which human rights organizations have criticized as being excessively brutal and violating civil liberties.
The IDF's influence on U.S. policing has been cited as a factor in the militarization of American police forces and the aggressive tactics employed against protesters, particularly those critical of Israel's policies. In the context of the recent crackdown on pro-Palestinian university student demonstrations, the IDF's training of U.S. police adds another layer of complexity and raises questions about the appropriateness of using military tactics on American civilians exercising their First Amendment rights.
EYE ON THE APPLE PIE: MOSSAD’S U.S. SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
With an annual budget of about $3bn and 7,000 staff, Mossad is the second-largest espionage agency in the Western world after the CIA.
The U.S. government concluded within the past two years that Israel was most likely behind the placement of cellphone surveillance devices that were found near the White House and other sensitive locations around Washington, according to three former senior U.S. officials with knowledge of the matter.
The Mossad infiltration into everything American is thick and was to be exposed in 2018 with an investigative documentary by Qatari broadcaster Al Jazeera scheduled for broadcast that “centered on the young and personable James Anthony Kleinfeld, British, Jewish, an Oxford graduate who speaks six languages, including Dutch and Yiddish, and is well-informed about Middle East conflicts—seemingly a natural fit for a Western foreign ministry or a major think tank.”
Kleinfeld was recruited for his skills by theIsrael Project (TIP), which “defends Israel’s image in the media, and associating with senior members of organizations that support Israel unconditionally, especially the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful US lobbying group.”
The documentary showed Kleinfeld being enthusiastically recruited for his skills by The Israel Project (TIP), which defends Israel’s image in the media, and associating with senior members of organizations that support Israel unconditionally, especially the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the powerful US lobbying group. For five months, he mixed with them at cocktail parties, congresses, and conventions, and on training courses. He won their trust and they opened up to him, abandoning doublespeak and official lines. How, he asked, did they go about influencing the US Congress? “Congressmen don’t do anything unless you pressure them, and the only way to do that is with money.” How did they counter Palestinian-rights activists on university campuses? “With the anti-Israel people, what’s most effective, what we found at least in the last year, is you do the opposition research, put up some anonymous website, and then put up targeted Facebook ads.
It’s not like the State of Israel doesn’t know what it is doing:
Kleinfeld’s contacts told him they were spying on US citizens with the help of Israel’s Ministry of Strategic Affairs, founded in 2006, which reports directly to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. One official said: “We are a different government working on foreign soil, [so] we have to be very, very cautious.” And indeed some of the things they do could be subject to prosecution under US law.
This brings us to the case of Rebecca Weiner, a prime example of the hidden dangers of dual citizenship in sensitive government and agency positions.
Protests at Columbia University began on April 17, with students escalating their ongoing demonstration against Israel's actions in Gaza. They encamped on school grounds, refusing to leave until the university fully divested from its Israeli-related investments. This protest model spread to over 100 other universities in the U.S. and abroad.
Rebecca Weiner, an adjunct professor at Columbia University and the head of the NYPD's counter-terrorism bureau, led the violent crackdown on Columbia students protesting Israel's assault on the Gaza Strip. During a press conference on May 1, New York City Mayor Eric Adams praised Weiner for monitoring the situation and giving the green light to clear out the protesters by force, resulting in the arrest of nearly 300 people on university grounds.
I’m wondering how Weiner gained such agency and power over university students and the NYPD.
The NYPD's Counterterrorism Bureau maintains an office in Tel Aviv, yes, in Tel Aviv, where it coordinates with Israel's security apparatus. Weiner appears to act as a bridge between the Bureau's offices in Israel and New York, suggesting an inappropriate level of foreign influence on domestic policing. Even more disturbing is the secretive NYPD "Demographics Unit" within the Bureau, developed with the CIA, which has spied on Muslims and Palestine solidarity activists, even outside of New York. This unit was reportedly modeled on how Israeli authorities operate in the occupied West Bank.
During a press conference, Weiner blamed a police crackdown on protesters' language and symbols, like "headbands associated with foreign terrorist organizations," rather than any actual criminal behavior. This suggests an effort to recast political speech as terrorism, a tactic all too familiar to those who follow Israel's treatment of Palestinians.
During the post-raid press conference, Weiner blamed "outside agitators" and the protesters' language and symbols for triggering the crackdown, claiming they represented "a normalization and mainstreaming of rhetoric associated with terrorism." Mayor Adams repeatedly cast the crackdown as necessary to prevent the radicalization of young people without providing specifics.
NETANYAHU’S CONDEMNATION OF U.S. STUDENT PROTESTS FOLLOWED BY SWIFT IDF-TRAINED POLICE CRACKDOWN
The timing of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's condemnation of pro-Palestinian student protests in the United States and the subsequent police crackdown on these demonstrations raises serious questions about the influence of Israeli rhetoric on U.S. law enforcement actions.
On Wednesday, April 24, 2024, Netanyahu delivered a scathing speech, labeling the protests as "horrific" and claiming that "antisemitic mobs have taken over leading universities.” He drew parallels to the rise of Nazism in 1930s Germany and called for the protests to be "stopped" and "condemned unequivocally.”
Mere hours after Netanyahu's inflammatory remarks, U.S. police forces, many of whom have received training from Israeli security forces, moved swiftly to quash the student demonstrations. At Columbia University, the epicenter of the protests, the NYPD arrested nearly 300 students just hours after Netanyahu's speech. Similar crackdowns occurred at other universities across the country.
Now, don’t get me wrong. I don’t take these University protests seriously. But I can’t help but notice this as the perfect set-up for the recently passed “anti-semitism” law.
How long will the average American be duped by these political theatrics that always justify the evisceration of our constitutional rights?
The recent wave of anti-Israel protests on college campuses across the United States has been fueled, in part, by the financial backing of billionaire investor George Soros and his network of left-wing organizations. A New York Post investigation has revealed that Soros, through his Open Society Foundations and a web of affiliated non-profits, has funneled significant funds to groups like Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), Jewish Voice for Peace, and the US Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR). These groups have been at the forefront of the protests, which began with a student occupation at Columbia University and quickly spread to other prestigious institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Berkeley.
The influence of Soros' money on these protests is particularly evident at Columbia, where students have set up a city of matching tents on the university's lawn, complete with supplies purchased from Amazon, free food from various restaurants, and coffee from Dunkin'. Soros' cash has been traced through his Open Society Foundations and other non-profits and has been crucial in sustaining these demonstrations. Additionally, the USCPR, another Soros-backed group, offers financial support to "fellows" who dedicate their time to organizing campaigns led by Palestinian organizations, further underscoring the role of outside funding in driving these protests.
The fact that these aggressive police actions followed so closely on the heels of Netanyahu's comments suggests a troubling level of coordination between Israeli leadership and U.S. law enforcement. It raises the specter of a foreign government wielding undue influence over the suppression of free speech and peaceful assembly in the United States.
THE EROSION OF THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT, THE LOSS OF PROTECTION
This militarization has accelerated in recent years through programs like the Pentagon's 1033 program that transfers military equipment to local law enforcement, which has already led to a more aggressive and confrontational approach to policing.
The recent crackdown on student demonstrations at Columbia University and other campuses bears the hallmarks of this IDF-influenced approach to policing. The use of heavily armed riot police, aggressive dispersal tactics, and mass arrests mirrors the methods used by Israeli forces against Palestinian protesters in the occupied territories. The fact that these tactics are being employed against students engaging in peaceful protest and civil disobedience raises serious concerns about the erosion of democratic principles and the chilling effect on free speech. It also highlights the dangerous consequences of allowing foreign military forces to shape the practices of U.S. law enforcement, particularly when those forces have a history of human rights abuses and suppressing dissent. As the militarization of police continues to escalate, fueled by IDF training and the weakening of restrictions like the Posse Comitatus Act, the right to protest and the freedom of expression are increasingly under threat, even on the campuses of our nation's most prestigious universities.
The events of the past week have shone a harsh light on the consequences of the unhealthy relationship between the U.S. government, universities, law enforcement, and Israel. When our police are taking their cues from a foreign government with a history of human rights abuses, the very foundations of our democracy are at risk.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS BUT HIGH STANDARDS
The concerns around dual citizenship extend beyond just Israel, of course. Imagine the outcry if we had a significant number of dual citizens in Congress with loyalty to China, Russia, or Iran. It would be seen as a major national security issue. So why do we turn a blind eye when it comes to Israel?
It is time for a thorough reevaluation of these ties and a recommitment to the principles of free speech and peaceful (non-Soros-backed) protests that define our nation.
It's time for a serious conversation about dual citizenship and the conflicts of interest it can create. I believe we need to pass legislation making it illegal for any official U.S. representative to hold dual citizenship with any country. It's a matter of national security to ensure that our government officials are acting solely in the interests of the American people.
If I had to do it as a city council member, they should be required to do so as well.
We must also investigate the role of dual citizens like Rebecca Weiner in our law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The American people deserve to know if foreign loyalties are influencing the actions of those sworn to protect and serve us.
As uncomfortable as it may be, we cannot ignore the potential dangers of dual citizenship in our government. The ties that bind us to other countries must not be allowed to compromise our national interests. It's time to take a hard look at where our officials' loyalties truly lie - and take action to ensure that the United States always comes first.
CALL TO ACTION
There is something you can do. I implore you to share this link widely with a Call to Action.
If your congressperson has dual citizenship, file a complaint saying that they are influenced by their secondary citizenship, owing allegiance to another nation's interests, and should be expelled for conflict of interest and inability to uphold their oath.
If you find these interviews and articles informative, please become a paid subscriber for under 17¢ a day.I don’t believe in paywalls, but this is how I make a living, so any support is appreciated. Either way…. it’s available to you….
