Wednesday 30 August 2023

 

United States: 10 Vaxx Phastic Doctors sentenced to Death!

10 Fanatic American Doctors of the Vaxx, not Vaxxinés, but forcing Harmful Injections to their Patients, are condemned to Hanging!

The Corps of the Judge-Lawyer General of the United States Navy (the JAG) and the office of military commissions entered unexplored territory on Thursday by simultaneously charging, sentending and senten to death 10 doctors from Washington State for negligent homicide, mass medical practice resulting in serious injury or death, and treason against the United States of America, a Camp Blaz Adjutant informed Michael Baxter.
As we reported this month, the "White Hats" of the American military apparatus arrested 100 doctors, alleging that their adherence to draconian protocols and their personal ambitions were endangering the lives of patients.

In a long affidagretment, the JAG claims that the defendants reprimanded and belittled patients hesitant to get vaccinated and threatened to put them on "medical blacklists" if they did not comply with CDC guidelines.

Before the indictment, JAG investigators, who pretended to be patients, went to vaccine-friendly clinics in 12 states, where they were also verbally accosted and refused treatment because they refused to present vaccination documents or get vaccinated in the office.

Most of the 100 doctors practiced in Washington State, California, Illinois, New York and Connecticut.
Once apprehended, the diabolical doctors were taken to "reception centers" and questioned by JAG investigators.

None expressed remorse for endangering the lives of patients; on the contrary, they proudly defended their actions, reciting what seemed to be a repeated mantra: "I followed the COVID-19 protocols and CDC guidelines".
According to our source, mass detention created a considerable dilemma, because the JAG did not have the time or resources to individually try 100 doctors accused of almost identical crimes.

The only practical options, he added, were to jointly prosecute the 100 doctors or to separate the herd into manageable groups according to the strength of the evidence.

Thursday's trial at Camp Blaz saw 10 of the 100 doctors and a defense lawyer appointed by the JAG oppose Rear Admiral Johnathon Stephens.
In April, Stephens sued the JAG in the case of the CDC's Deputy Director for Global Health, Howard Zucker.

It is also planned that he will jointly prosecute the 165 Fort Drum soldiers who conspired to wage war on Trump supporters.
"We have so many pending and upcoming indictments; joint courts are, you know, for efficiency.

Otherwise, we will be pleading cases long after we have all turned into dust, "said our source.
When asked if the JAG had taken into account the ramifications of a joint acquittal theoretically exempting hundreds of criminals who could again wreak havoc among citizens, he replied: "We are doing this with irrefutable cases.

The criminals of the Maui FEMA will be tried together, just like the doctors, and they will all go to the gallows."
He added that Thursday's success at Camp Blaz proved that the JAG could condemn several criminals at once.

Admiral Stephens began the court by presenting (in ZOOM) a 40-year-old woman from Seattle who had taken her sick 14-year-old son to their family doctor, identified as the No. 6 accused, in June 2021.

The boy had developed conjunctivitis and his mother wanted antibiotic eye drops to treat the condition.

Accused No. 6 claimed that conjunctivitis, or "Covid Eye", was an unpublished symptom of the coronavirus and asked if the two children were vaccinated.

When the mother answered "no", saying that she wanted additional evidence that the vaccines were safe and effective, defendant No. 6 went into tyrannical anger and demanded that they be tested immediately or leave the premises, even if the mother and son were wearing masks.

They agreed to this unreasonable mandate and a technician violently took their noses.

When rapid antigenic tests were negative, defendant No. 6 imposed another requirement: immediate vaccination.

They refused and were expelled from the cabinet.
"And what did you do at that time?

Admiral Stephens asked the 16-year-old who appeared on the screen: "My mother took me to a health center.
"My mother took me to an emergency care center, 15 minutes away," replied the boy.
"And you were treated there?" asks the Admiral.

"No, sir. They didn't want to treat me either," says the boy.
"Is it true? Have you and your mother been given a reason?" asks the Admiral.
"Yes, sir. Because we were not vaccinated and we did not want to be vaccinated. As before..."
"We were told that our names had been put on a list and that they would be transmitted to the CDC and the State Department of Health.
"So, what you are saying is that during the 15 minutes it took us to get from point A to point B, your names were placed on a universal list of bad guys," said the admiral.
"I don't know if it's universal, sir, and we've never seen the list, but I'm almost sure the office said it was statewide," says the boy.

"I happen to have this list," says Admiral Stephens.
He places a stack of stapled documents on the table next to the members of the jury, three naval officers chosen to decide the fate of the doctors.

The ten accused are seated, handcuffed, side by side, at three rectangular tables pushed together to form a single tray.

At one end, a Navy Captain to whom Vice-Admiral Darse E. Crandall had entrusted the heavy task of defending the accused, helped by three legal assistants who whispered among themselves while mixing tons of paperwork.

While Admiral Stephens draws the attention of the jury to the blacklist, the defense calls for the immediate abandonment of all charges because private doctors, unlike hospitals that respect health insurance rules, have the possibility to refuse treatment to their patients.
"Request rejected," Admiral Stephens said bluntly.

"The defense is aware that this is not only a case of refusal of service, but a vast conspiracy to refuse to treat patients who are hesitant to get vaccinated.
"I don't need to witness this," exclaimed the accused No. 6.
"Control your customer. If he wants to talk, he can come to the bar today," replied the Admiral.
Admiral Stephens again addresses the witnesses, whose perplexed faces are still on the ZOOM call.

"We apologize for our outburst.

Do you recognize the doctors who refused treatment as being in this courtroom today?"
The young man designates the accused No. 6 and No. 10. His mother attests to it.
"The list in front of you, the blacklist, has 750 names, all residents of King and Pierce counties.

The list was kept in real time and shared electronically with more than a hundred offices and clinics.

The accused had access to the list and could add names to it.

Refuse service if the person is not vaccinated or if he or she agrees to be vaccinated.

The JAG is perplexed because of the ten accused, none is vaccinated.

We know this because we took their blood and analyzed it to detect the Covid antibodies that would be present in case of vaccination.

It could be argued that in one, two or even three cases, the antibodies dissipated, but not in ten cases - this is a statistical impossibility.

In addition, 90 other people are waiting to be tried and they are not vaccinated either, "explained the Admiral.
The Navy Captain objected that the JAG had asked Admiral Stephens to limit the evidence to the accused present in court.

Admiral Stephens maintained the objection and asked the jury to disregard his last statement.

But the fiery Navy Captain continued his objection, saying that the admiral, a lawyer without medical knowledge, could not be authoritative in virology and immunology.
After dismissing the witnesses, Admiral Stephens called Commander Brent Dennings, a virologist at Guam Naval Hospital, to the helm, who repeated the Admiral's assessment in medical language.
"Commander Dennings, have you personally evaluated the blood tests of the accused? asks Admiral Stephens.
"Yes, sir," answers the Commander.

"And what conclusion did you reach?" asks the Admiral.
"That none of the accused had been vaccinated," replied the Commander.
"Does the defense have any questions to ask this expert witness?" asked Admiral Stephens.
"No questions," replied the Captain of the Ship.
"The witness is excused," said the Admiral, before turning to the jury.

"This raises a question that we cannot ignore: Why did these doctors insist that their patients be vaccinated when they were not?

We see only three possibilities: They knew that COVID was mild, they knew that vaccines were dangerous, or both, "said the Admiral.

Over the next three hours, the admiral organized ZOOM calls with six other witnesses, each of whom sought treatment for benign diseases by one or more of the accused and whose testimony reflected that of the mother and son.

They called the accused as pernicious predators who abused their so-called position of authority to deceive patients.

A witness said that his doctor, the accused No. 4, had the foam in his mouth to push a needle into his arm.
"These witnesses are lucky, lucky to have had enough common sense to challenge great medicine and refuse bites," Admiral Stephens told the expert group.

"Some people we would like to hear cannot be present today.

They can't be there because they are dead.

They died because the accused pushed them to get vaccinated, which they did."

He showed a photo of a lifeless woman on a stretcher carried to the back of an ambulance, as well as an image of a middle-aged man who died suddenly while attending a baseball game.
"These were patients of defendants No. 1 and No. 2.

No comorbidity.

No major health problems before being vaccinated.

Both died suddenly of a heart attack within 7 days of vaccination.

We know 65 patients who died suddenly, and they were all patients of the accused, "said the Admiral solemnly.
"These patients had their free will.

The accused did not threaten them with a pistol, "added the Captain of the Ship.
"In the strictest sense of the word, yes, they did it.

They violated their Hippocratic Oath not to harm, they violated Medical Secrecy by widely disseminating the status of vaccines via a blacklist, and they ensured that if a patient, for any reason whatsoever, did not want this damn vaccine, this patient must go very far to find medical treatment.

They respected the CDC line but were not vaccinated, and each received a discharge of responsibility issued by the HHS and the FDA, very similar to the discharges granted to Big Pharma, "said Admiral Stephens.
He distributed copies of these derogations to the jury.
"In short, the accused are released from all responsibility and immunized against any dispute related to the side effects of vaccines," he said.

"No, the accused are not military; they are not government representatives, elected or appointed, but they have an influence, a strong influence, on their patients.

What we have here is nothing less than mass medical misconduct, negligent homicide, conspiracy and betrayal, "concluded the Admiral.
The defense did not present a valid refutation and the jury asked for time - five and a half hours - to make a decision.

After rendering a guilty verdict and recommending the maximum authorized sentence, Admiral Stephens thanked them for their service and released them from their duties.
He did not immediately set the execution dates, but indicated that the hangings would begin within the week.


By Michael Baxter on August 27, 2023:
https://realrawnews.com/2023/08/jag-sentences-10-clot-shot-loving-physicians-to-hang/

No comments:

Post a Comment

  WHO's Fascist F**kery: "Homicidal Racketeering Scheme Masquerading As Disease Prevention" Authored by James Howard Kunstler ...